Guillaume Net Worth

Gregoire Poux Guillaume Net Worth 2026 Estimate and Sources

gregoire poux-guillaume net worth

Based on the most recent available data, Gregoire Poux-Guillaume's estimated net worth is approximately $4 million (USD), as of April 29, 2026. That figure comes primarily from his disclosed equity stake in AkzoNobel N.V., where he serves as CEO, and reflects publicly trackable holdings rather than a full picture of his private wealth.

Who is Gregoire Poux-Guillaume?

Minimal photo of a modern CEO-style office desk with a microphone and city skyline through a window

Gregoire (Greg) Poux-Guillaume is a French national, born in January 1970, with a career spanning some of Europe's largest industrial companies. He was appointed CEO of AkzoNobel N.V., the Dutch paints and coatings giant, effective November 1, 2022, a move widely covered by Reuters and confirmed in AkzoNobel's own shareholder biography materials. Before that, he served as CEO of Sulzer, the Swiss industrial engineering company, from 2015. Earlier in his career, he led GE Grid Solutions following GE's acquisition of Alstom's energy businesses, and before that he ran Alstom Grid. It is worth flagging this clearly: there are a handful of people with similar or partially overlapping names in French business circles. Gregoire Poux-Guillaume specifically refers to this individual, the current AkzoNobel CEO with the documented career history above. He should not be confused with Guillaume Pousaz, the fintech entrepreneur behind Checkout.com, whose net worth sits in an entirely different league, nor with Guillaume V, Grand Duke of Luxembourg. The identity is distinct and well-documented through corporate governance filings.

What 'net worth' actually means here

Net worth, at its most basic, is total assets minus total liabilities. For an individual, assets typically include cash and bank balances, investment portfolios, equity stakes in public or private companies, real estate, and other valuables. Liabilities include outstanding debt, mortgages, tax obligations, and any known legal settlements. The result is a snapshot of financial position at a specific point in time, not a permanent figure.

For a public company executive like Poux-Guillaume, one slice of that picture is verifiable: the equity he holds in the publicly traded company where he works. That stake has a real-time market value anyone can calculate. Everything else, including cash savings, private investments, real estate, and debt, is either partially disclosed or entirely private. This is why published net worth figures for executives at this level should always be treated as estimates with a floor that can be confirmed, not a precise total.

Where net worth estimates come from for executives like this

Minimal desk scene with paperwork, a laptop showing anonymous shareholding-style pages, and a calculator for net worth s

For senior corporate executives, the most reliable starting point is disclosed equity in publicly listed companies. Regulatory filings, insider ownership disclosures, and corporate governance documents give a traceable share count and a market-price-based valuation on any given date. Beyond that, estimators draw on career income history (executive compensation is often disclosed in annual reports), known real estate holdings from property registries, and any other public financial signals.

In Poux-Guillaume's case, French property records via Pappers show a linked entity called SCI ROYALE SAINTE ANNE (registered in Paris, activity: real estate), which suggests some real estate involvement, as is common for executives at this level. SCIs (Sociétés Civiles Immobilières) are a standard French vehicle for holding residential or investment property. However, the specific asset values inside that structure are not publicly disclosed, so it adds context without adding a hard number.

How this site calculates and validates the estimate

The methodology used here follows a balance-sheet approach: start with what can be verified, then apply reasonable assumptions for what cannot. For Poux-Guillaume, the anchoring data point is his AkzoNobel shareholding. MarketScreener's insider profile records 74,359 shares in AkzoNobel N.V. representing approximately 0.04% of the company, with a valuation date of April 29, 2026, producing a figure of roughly $4 million for that holding alone.

From there, the estimate accounts for known liabilities including likely tax obligations on executive compensation, and adjusts for market movements where a significant publicly traded holding exists. Executive compensation packages (base salary, bonuses, and long-term incentive plans) for a CEO of a major European industrial company in this revenue tier typically range from several hundred thousand to well over a million euros annually, some of which is delivered as equity that may or may not be captured in disclosed shareholding data depending on vesting schedules. Private investments, savings, and real estate values are not deducted or added precisely because they are not disclosed. The $4 million figure therefore represents a verifiable floor grounded in publicly confirmed equity, not a ceiling.

Current estimated net worth: the number and what supports it

Minimal photo of an analyst desk with a calculator and AkzoNobel-like stock holding notebook
Data PointDetailSource Type
AkzoNobel shares held74,359 shares (~0.04% of company)Insider disclosure / MarketScreener
Valuation of holding~$4 million USDMarketScreener (as of April 29, 2026)
Real estate vehicleSCI ROYALE SAINTE ANNE, Paris (real estate activity)French company registry (Pappers)
Career income historyCEO at AkzoNobel (2022-present), Sulzer (2015-2022), GE Grid Solutions, Alstom GridCorporate biographies, Reuters
Overall net worth estimate$4 million (floor estimate, public equity only)Aggregated from above

The most defensible current estimate for Gregoire Poux-Guillaume's net worth is in the range of $4 million to $10 million. If you are specifically searching for Guillaume Lemay Thivierge net worth, note that most published figures depend on verifiable holdings and dated snapshots like the ones used in executive net worth estimates here. The lower bound is supported directly by the disclosed AkzoNobel equity stake. The upper bound reflects a reasonable but unverified addition for accumulated career compensation over a decade-plus as a major industrial CEO, likely real estate holdings (given the Paris SCI), and general savings and investment assets common at this career level. It is not a billionaire-tier figure, and nothing in the available public record suggests otherwise. His situation is quite different from, say, Guillaume Pousaz, whose Checkout.com stake puts estimated wealth in the multi-billion dollar range.

Why the number is uncertain and how it can change

A few important caveats are worth being direct about. First, Poux-Guillaume is not a billionaire and is not tracked by Forbes or Bloomberg Billionaires, which means there is no continuous real-time update to his estimate the way there is for, say, a tech founder with a massive listed company stake. The MarketScreener figure is timestamped April 29, 2026, meaning it was accurate to AkzoNobel's share price on that date. AkzoNobel's stock price moves daily, so the equity portion of the estimate drifts continuously.

Second, the real estate and private investment side is opaque. The Paris SCI is a real data point but gives no asset value. French property values in premium Paris locations can be significant, but without a disclosure or transaction record, no number can be responsibly attached. Third, executive compensation at publicly listed European companies is disclosed in annual reports, but the exact amount varies year to year, and unvested equity awards complicate the total. Any figure you see on a third-party aggregator site without clear sourcing should be treated skeptically.

Finally, estimates across different sites frequently disagree because they use different methodologies, different snapshot dates, and different assumptions about undisclosed assets. A site showing $8 million and a site showing $4 million may both be reasonable depending on what they are including. The $4 million figure from MarketScreener is the most clearly sourced and dated estimate publicly available as of May 2026.

How to verify or update this figure yourself

  1. Check AkzoNobel's annual report and proxy filings (available on akzonobel.com under Investors) for the most current CEO shareholding disclosure and executive compensation figures.
  2. Search MarketScreener's insider profile for 'Greg Poux-Guillaume' to find the most recent valuation date and updated share count.
  3. Cross-reference AkzoNobel's current share price (ticker: AKZA on Euronext Amsterdam) with the disclosed share count to calculate the equity stake's current market value.
  4. Search Pappers (pappers.fr) for 'Gregoire Poux-Guillaume' to check for any new company registrations or updated property-related structures.
  5. Review the AFM (Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets) insider transaction database for any recent share purchases or disposals that would change the holding figure.

FAQ

Why do different websites list very different “gregoire poux guillaume net worth” numbers?

Most discrepancies come from what they include. Some figures only price the disclosed AkzoNobel shares on a specific date, while others add a rough guess for cash, bonuses, and private investments. If a site does not state the date and the exact share count method, treat the number as a broad estimate rather than a verified total.

Is the $4 million figure mainly his AkzoNobel shares, or is it a full balance-sheet calculation?

It is best understood as a floor tied to publicly traceable equity holdings. A true balance-sheet net worth would require the value of private investments, cash, real estate inside any SCI vehicle, and total debt, and those components are usually not fully disclosed.

How should I interpret the SCI ROYALE SAINTE ANNE mention (French real estate vehicle) for his net worth?

The SCI supports the idea of real estate involvement, but it does not provide the property values or the ownership split behind the vehicle. Without disclosed asset valuations or filings that show attributable equity, you cannot reliably convert the SCI existence into a specific net worth add-on.

What happens to his net worth estimate month to month, even if his personal finances do not change?

Because his AkzoNobel stake is marked to market, the estimated equity value rises or falls with the stock price. So a “net worth” update that tracks daily market moves can look like a personal wealth change even when it is only valuation drift.

Could he have significant debt that would reduce the real net worth below the estimate range?

Yes in principle, but it is not easily verifiable from public sources at the individual level. Most executive net worth estimates are conservative about liabilities because specific personal debt, mortgages, or tax assessments are not consistently disclosed, which is why estimates should not be treated as exact.

Do unvested stock awards and performance incentives affect the net worth numbers I see online?

They can, but many calculators only capture shares that are already held and disclosed. Unvested equity, conditional awards, and vesting schedules often do not translate into an immediate share count, so some sites will understate and others will overstate depending on assumptions.

How can I tell whether I’m looking at the correct person when searching “gregoire poux guillaume net worth”?

First confirm the CEO role and employer, AkzoNobel, and the career timeline. Similar French names exist in business circles, and incorrect identity is a common reason for wild net worth mismatches. If the source does not tie the numbers to the AkzoNobel executive profile, it may be mixing identities.

Is $4 million to $10 million a realistic range, or could it be higher?

Based on disclosed equity as a verifiable anchor, it is difficult to justify a dramatically higher total without evidence of large additional disclosed assets or clear private holdings. The upper bound typically reflects plausible accumulated compensation and potential real estate value, but it remains partly assumption-driven, not confirmed.

Why isn’t he included in Forbes or Bloomberg Billionaires lists, and what does that imply?

Those lists require thresholds and methodologies geared to global wealth estimates for the very wealthy. Not being present suggests there is no credible public signal that he reaches billionaire level, but it does not automatically prove a specific exact number below the threshold.

Next Article

Guillaume Pousaz Net Worth: Estimate, Sources, and How It’s Calculated

Estimation de la fortune de Guillaume Pousaz avec fourchette, sources publiques et méthode de calcul expliquée

Guillaume Pousaz Net Worth: Estimate, Sources, and How It’s Calculated